Saturday, March 7, 2015

Non-Existence and Why We Shouldn't Be Afraid of it

The fear of death is most probably the biggest trigger out there for religion and faith.
Humans fear death, mostly because of the unknown element attached to it:
Without religion, we don't know what happens to us after death.
What do we feel? Where do we "go"? Do we keep our memories? Are we accountable for our deeds in life? So on and so forth.

The fear of death is also the most common "last stand" fallback position that theists go to when the foundations of their faith are rattled.

I can't even count the number of times theists brought this issue up when they seem to have run out of arguments and counter-arguments:
"So what happens after you die?", "You just stop existing and that's it?", "What's the point of living if it's all for nothing?", etc.

Well, there are several ways to approach this issue.
The most common answer that I've seen used by atheists is that after you die, you don't necessarily "disappear" into non-existence. You still exist in the memories of your loved ones and next of kin. And if you were truly a remarkable person, then you might even gain "immortality" by being remembered for untold generations to come.
Some "immortal" men for example: Albert Einstein, Isaac Newton, William Shakespeare, Ludwig Van Beethoven and so on, you get the idea. These people, although long dead, still "exist" in our everyday lives by the very fact of us remembering them and their achievements and lives.

Obviously, it's not a very 'satisfying' type of "immortality", because you're not there to enjoy it in person. So naturally, theists, selfish as they are, usually don't accept this kind of answer.

Another common answer atheists give is that the very fact that we are bound to die and stop existing at some point, only makes this life we have ever more precious and priceless.
It's an invitation to enjoy this one life we have and make the best you can out of it, because we have absolutely no other chance.

Theists usually don't seem to accept this answer either, although from my experience they don't really give a reason why. They just can't seem to wrap their heads around the notion of "one chance only". It's like automatically a reason for them to commit suicide and end the one life they have. It really boggles my mind why would anyone want to do that.

Personally, I agree with both of those common answers described above.
Yes, this life is precious because there's no other, and yes, we can achieve "immortality" by living in the memories of future generations (although it's an impersonal kind of "immortality"). Both of these notions together can push us to make the absolute best we can out of this life, as well as positively influence the world to make it better for future generations.

But there is another type of answer which is not so common. And here, although already more than halfway through this post, we reach the actual crux of the matter and the whole reason why I'm writing this.

We need to wrap our heads around an amazing fact. A mind-boggling, mind-blowing and yet a staggeringly simple fact:

We shouldn't be afraid of non-existence. Because we already passed it:
WE DID NOT ALWAYS EXIST.

What? You forgot? Where do you think you were before you were born, sugar?
You did not exist.

Do you remember this "non-existence"? You have memories of your experiences? Your feelings? Your ambitions? Obviously not. Because you did not exist.
And yet, the world existed all the same without you.

People lived. People died. People did this and that. Built things. Destroyed things. Killed each other. Saved each other. The rain was dropping. The sun was rising. The birds were singing. The dogs were humping. Life just... Went on.

So... Do you care about that, dear believer? Are you not upset about the fact that before you were born you did not exist? No? Why not? Isn't this fact just as disturbing as the fact that one day you'll be going back to that kind of state of non-existence?

Consider the following:
Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that before you were born you existed in some other form. Perhaps in some other dimension, perhaps as a completely different person. You had thoughts, memories, ambitions, and so on. But you don't remember any of that now, of course. All you remember is what you learned since after you were born into this life. Think for a second what that means. All those thoughts and memories of the person you were before... Everything that person went through... All of that was gone the moment you were born and started from scratch as a new person. How is that different from that other person... Stopping to exist? They stopped existing, and then you started existing as a whole other person with new memories and experiences.



This is, of course, a hypothetical scenario assuming there's such a thing as reincarnation or whatever.
But, as we already established, you don't really remember who or what you were before you were born, right? So... How is it different from the FACT that after you die, somewhere out there in the world, a new person is going to be born... A whole new person from scratch... Without any memories of what they were before they were born, but with new memories to gain in their new life? Who can say for sure that that new person will not be you? But since that "new" person won't have your memories anyway, does it really matter if it really is you or not?

How is it different?

So if you fear of nonexistence, get over yourself, champ.
You've already been there, done that.
Make the best of what you have.

Just remember one important thing:
After you're gone, the world will keep on living.
Humans will keep on being born.
So why not do what you can to make this world a better place for them?
For all you know, those "future" humans are...

You.


4 comments:

  1. Hi, I'm George Wolf and I like to look at this problem in terms of my hypothesis; religion is a communicable fantasy that uses our instincts against us to create an addiction, evolves like a parasite and never plays fair.

    "Life after death" is probably one of religion's more cruel ways to cause addiction to itself. It exploits our instinct for self-preservation. If you argue with a religious person about it, you will excite the fear of death in him or her, turning "life after death" into yet another withdrawal symptom.

    It reminds me of how I felt when I smoked; somebody would tell me about smoking's fatal effects, and I'd think about quitting -- then I'd think about the withdrawal symptoms I'd gone through the last time I'd tried to quit and I'd find myself itching for another smoke even more!

    The trick for me was to learn to not take the withdrawal symptoms seriously; I got to the point where I could laugh at them. I propose that this should work with death too. My mental response to somebody talking about their "afterlife" is to think that neither one us are going to get one, and that won't change by pretending otherwise.

    More to the point, I think the chances are close to infinitely high that any "afterlife" proposed by a religion is false. Instead, religions have ulterior "motives" that have been "designed" by natural selection; a religion that posits an afterlife lie is more addicting than one that doesn't. Whether you believe in an afterlife or not has no ultimate effect; you and the copy of the religious fantasy will both cease to exist as living entities upon your death.

    The motive for the "Life after Death" lie is very obvious, in terms of the religion parasite; you get a "good" afterlife or reincarnation if you obey the parasite's stupid commands, or a "bad" one if you don't.

    So I'd say the choice is very obvious; anybody who accepts a "life after death" myth is actually continuing an addiction to the religion parasite. That's all. There's never been any good proof for either an "afterlife" or a "reincarnation." Religion made us fear it, and it is only in the parasite's selfish interest to promote it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm actually +James Preston Thomas and don't recall signing up to 'Google plus' with my alter-ego "siccarii", but that's me too, no secrets.

    +Eitan Blumin, I'm shocked that you have only 1 comment!!! Now 2 with this one.

    I related to every word of your blog on 'existence and non-existence'. I could add a few things, but they'd likely be redundant with your thoughts. Maybe some day, some way, we might meet and spend a little time indulging in mostly agreement. I'd enjoy that!

    We don't agree on everything for sure, but I don't think it matters, actually I'm certain it doesn't matter! For what it's worth in dollars, Euros or Sheckels, I'm very appreciative of minds like yours!

    Simply existing is one hell of an interesting experience! I'll keep on enjoying the experience until I no longer exist, of course.

    I don't fear death at all, for exactly the reasons you've stated. I am, however, concerned with HOW I end, in that I don't want pain myself nor for others I care about. But I also see that sometimes it's a 'Sophie's choice'!

    I somewhat reluctantly look forward to my time of departure, hoping to regain some of the past iterations of myself and retaining the best of my current self in the meanwhile.

    I'm lovin' it!!! Feel as good as you possibly can my friend, It's the essence of 'being', aka 'existing'.

    Existence/non-existence, it's all the same, as we seem to be in both realms (for lack of better words). That and the perceptions of time and location. I'm 'here and now', and then 'I won't be'. No problem, as if it matters.

    I love tomorrow, almost as much as today. Sheesh, an idiot can sound profound with little effort on this subject matter (I say to myself). And sound even better with a Grammar, Spellchecker, a Thesaurus, and a few other mental toys like Wiki!

    How did I ever get along without the computer?

    Pretty well as I recall, but that perspective was then and this is now! It just keeps getting better! Ain't it great?

    ReplyDelete
  3. /The fear of death is most probably the biggest trigger out there for religion and faith.//


    Like theists, this is a preaching, too.

    At least until you try to put some extra arguments on that so-called "Non-Existence".

    Religion and faith can be useful or useless, beneficient or harmful.
    In this very life I live within, I hope that I can be at my fullest. The fullest of my humanity.
    What is that mean?
    Be it Jesus, Odin, Science (if this is another god-equivalent stuff) or Allah, I just need to make sure that I am on the track toward my fullest life.

    So, it has not necessarily to do with afterlife or fear of death. Well, I admire that I do sometimes hardly keep myself away from falling into that kind of fear.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. /The fear of death is most probably the biggest trigger out there for religion and faith.//

      Is not "preaching".
      It's an observation of theistic behavior and openly admitted beliefs.

      Delete